Table Of Content
More than twice is a huge finding that has jump-started the hair relaxer litigation. This new hair relaxer case comes on the heels of the recent motion to consolidate the hair relaxer cancer cases into a new class action MDL. Our focus is on victims who have suffered significant injuries and death from hair relaxers. There are now at least 15 hair relaxer personal injury cases and three hair relaxer consumer class action cases pending. The JPML will decide to consolidate these cases into a new hair relaxer class action lawsuit next month. These updates of a few dozen hair relaxer lawsuits being filed will seem silly in hindsight if our prediction of over 100,000 claims in the MDL class action holds up.
Best for Volume
The reversible system lasts for up to six weeks, allowing you to straighten your hair less and experience less reversion. A minority of others were disappointed that their tighter texture didn’t return so only use this product if you’re okay with potential ending up with a looser pattern than your normal curl type. If your hair has a thicker, more coarse texture, this hydrating formula promises to make it more manageable and leave it feeling nourished.
Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit
L’Oreal and the other defendants strongly oppose MDL consolidation and will voice those objections at the hearing. There are already 15 hair relaxer lawsuits pending in federal courts and many more are expected, so the JPML will probably create an MDL. The plaintiffs recently filed a reply to the defendant’s brief in opposition to the MDL.
Best for Sensitive Scalps
Hair relaxers contain a phthalate chemical called Di-2- ethyl hexyl phthalate (“DEHP”). DEHP is a synthetic chemical that is not found naturally in the environment. DEHP is considered a probable human carcinogen and it is known to cause significant adverse-health effects including developmental abnormalities and reproductive dysfunction and infertility. There was a telephonic hearing yesterday to resolve multiple disputes related to the nuts and bolts of discovery.
Hair Relaxer Class Action Lawsuit Updates
The order is part of Judge Rowland’s effort to manage an MDL that has started to explode in size over the last few weeks. Hair relaxer lawyers continue to battle over the production of documents. A hearing was held by Judge Sheila M. Finnegan to discuss the idea of hiring a Special Master with expertise in Electronic Stored Information (ESI), based on what both sides had previously reported.
The pace of new hair relaxer lawsuits has increased dramatically since the start of the new, with six new cases just in the last week. Last week we saw the highest weekly volume of new hair relaxer product liability lawsuits filed in federal courts, with 24 new cases. Fourteen new cases were filed on Thursday, and the other ten were filed on Friday. All but three of the new cases were filed in the Northern District of Illinois, which is the venue for the hair relaxer MDL. A Master Complaint has been submitted in federal court by the plaintiffs in the ongoing hair relaxer lawsuits. It is a consolidated document that outlines the common allegations raised in multiple individual lawsuits.
Best for Damaged Hair
A study led by the Boston University School of Public Health has demonstrated a link between the usage of chemical hair straighteners and declines in fertility. The research also discovered that these groups began using relaxers earlier, more frequently, and for longer periods, correlating with a drop in pregnancy chances. When the hair relaxer class action MDL was created earlier this year, there were just 21 pending cases before Judge Rowland in the Northern District of Illinois. Just 5 months later and there are now 236 pending cases in the hair relaxer MDL. There were 117 new cases added to the hair relaxer class action MDL over the last month, bringing the current number of pending cases up to 8,334. This is certainly a far cry from last summer when the MDL was averaging 2,500 new cases a month.
Last week, a new type of class action hair relaxer lawsuit was filed which seeks to force cosmetic companies to pay for a medical monitoring program for women who may be at risk from the harms of chemical hair relaxers. Since the start of February, 11 more hair relaxer product liability lawsuits have been filed in federal courts. The remaining four were filed in districts nationwide but will all be transferred into the new hair relaxer class action MDL. The primary purpose of a Master Complaint is to streamline the litigation process by combining all common allegations and evidence into a single document. This reduces duplication of effort, promotes judicial efficiency, and ensures consistent rulings across similar cases.
If you don’t file your case before your state’s statute of limitations expires, you will lose the right to file your lawsuit. The defendants named in the motion include L’Oreal USA, Inc. and a handful of smaller, non-public companies. But their lawyers will probably request an alternative venue other than Chicago, Illinois, that they view as more favorable. A ruling from the JPML centralizing the hair relaxer cases into a new class action MDL is expected sometime this week. If you’re filing a new case, it must be filed separately in the Northern District of Illinois.
New hair relaxer lawsuits filed in federal courts continue to be filed. There are over 200 pending hair relaxer cases across the country, most of which have already been transferred into the MDL. Thirty-eight new hair relaxer cancer lawsuits were filed in the second half of March alone.
The study showed that women who regularly used hair relaxer (more than 4 times per year) displayed a 50% increased risk of ovarian cancer. The issue of whether to consolidate the hair relaxer lawsuits into a class action MDL will be taken up by the JPML later this month. The plaintiffs recently filed a response to the defendants’ briefs opposing the MDL. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will add certain phthalates, such as DINP, to its list of harmful toxic chemicals subject to increased regulations and reporting requirements.
Setting aside the issue of whether this is too much of an ask, keep in mind that this has nothing to do with how much compensation you receive for your hair relaxer cancer lawsuit. This is about how much money the lawyers in leadership take from your lawyer’s fee. One of the downsides of using a relaxer is that you might end up with hair limpness.
Seven new hair relaxer product liability lawsuits have been filed in federal courts since the start of 2023. Four were filed in the Western District of Missouri, and the others were filed in the Northern District of Ohio, the Eastern District of Michigan, and the Eastern District of Louisiana. Uterine cancer was the primary injury alleged by five of the plaintiffs. The injuries alleged in the other two cases were ovarian cancer and uterine fibroids. Two more hair relaxer lawsuits were filed in federal courts yesterday. The first was filed in the Northern District of Illinois (the 10th hair relaxer case now pending in that district), and the second was filed in the Western District of Washington (the first in that district).
No comments:
Post a Comment